Why design debt destroys reputations (and how to fix It).
The real cost of inheriting messy user experiences and practical ways to address them strategically.
This week’s Product Party is brought to you by Chameleon.
Most interactive demo tools paywall the good stuff. Chameleon doesn't.
Their Free plan includes:
Unlimited demos (seriously)
Pro editing: pan, zoom, blur, custom media
Branching paths + email capture
Analytics to see what works
No budget approval needed. Just launch it.
I became the sole product manager at a startup and suddenly found myself responsible for our in-house CRM. The previous team had built with incredible flexibility - they could add whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted.
Instead, I inherited a digital Frankenstein.
Technically, everything worked. But the product felt like it had been assembled by seventeen different people with seventeen different ideas about how software should behave. There were bells and whistles everywhere, each one chipping away at what should have been simple user flows.
I quickly learned that design debt isn't just a user experience problem. It's a career problem. When stakeholders can't accomplish basic tasks efficiently, they don't blame the previous team's decisions. They question your current judgment.
What design debt actually costs your reputation.
Design debt accumulates through small compromises that seem reasonable in the moment but compound over time. A shortcut here, a workaround there, a "we'll fix it later" that never gets fixed. Each decision feels minor until you realize you're managing a product that constantly clashes with users.
The business impact was measurable in my situation. User satisfaction scores were declining, task completion rates were dropping, and people were making more errors. But here's the career reality: stakeholders don't care about historical context. They care about whether the product works well today.
I've watched talented product people get sidelined because they inherited poorly designed systems and never prioritized fixing them. Not that they were permanently stuck forever, but I did start to see them create and follow a self-narrative where their careers, in many ways, became defined by managing complexity rather than creating clarity.
Making the case for design cleanup.
When stakeholders want new features, arguing for design debt cleanup feels like asking to slow down. However, research shows that teams with high design debt experience poor UX metrics, increased user friction, and more frequent user complaints. You're addressing a documented business problem, not cosmetic issues.
I learned to reframe conversations in terms of strategic value. Instead of asking for time to "fix design problems," I started proposing investigations into what already existed. We had an e-notary feature where the initial request was to build something entirely new. Instead, I dug into how our existing feature worked.
We discovered we didn't need to rebuild anything. The bones of a great feature were already there, buried under incremental additions. By cleaning up the existing flow, we created something genuinely useful without starting from scratch.
Five ways to address design debt without derailing your roadmap.
Start with user flow audits before building new features.
When someone requests something new, map out how it would integrate with existing workflows. Often you'll discover that improving what exists delivers better value than building from scratch.
Track design debt metrics like technical debt.
Monitor user satisfaction scores, task completion rates, and error rates as part of your regular reporting. This gives you objective data when making the case for improvements.
Propose design improvements as feature development.
Instead of "we need to clean up the interface," say "we can increase task completion rates by 15% by streamlining this workflow." Same work, better framing.
Document the actual cost of accumulated complexity.
Show stakeholders how design debt slows down future development and creates user frustration. Make the hidden costs visible.
Batch design improvements with related feature work.
When building something adjacent to problem areas, include cleanup in the scope. It's easier to justify improving nearby flows when you're already working in that space.
Building design quality into your professional practice.
Your reputation depends on the experiences you deliver, not the constraints you inherited. When you consistently ship features that integrate well with existing functionality, you become known for strategic thinking rather than tactical execution.
The most successful product folks I know treat design debt as seriously as technical debt. They understand that the quality of user experience directly impacts their professional reputation and their ability to deliver on future commitments.
Every design shortcut you accept today becomes a professional liability you'll have to explain tomorrow. Your users won't remember the business constraints that led to confusing interfaces, but they will remember how your product made them feel.
Until next week,
Want to connect? Send me a message on LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, or Instagram.
Accurate.